# $NEAR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-10-01 23:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $NEAR  
> **Momentum Status:** Low signal  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-10-01 23:40 UTC (2026-10-01T23:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-01-23-40/crypto/NEAR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-01-23-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 129
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 129


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @01solo01
> **Author:** [@01solo01](https://x.com/01solo01)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 1 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/01solo01/status/2105805145884004805](https://x.com/01solo01/status/2105805145884004805)  


> 
> ""Every eligible participant got something" is a strong signal for the model, but the size of each allocation is the part I'd want to see next. Getting in and getting a meaningful amount are two different outcomes, and newcomers should know which one they're aiming for."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@SillyOwlChaos` (https://x.com/SillyOwlChaos)