# $POW Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-28 22:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $POW  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-28 22:30 UTC (2026-09-28T22:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-28-22-30/crypto/POW  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-28-22-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 549
- **Likes:** 7
- **Retweets:** 6
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 6, Likes: 7, Impressions: 549


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @SigCharts
> **Author:** [@SigCharts](https://x.com/SigCharts)  
> **Metrics:** 172 likes · 24 retweets · 41 comments · 18.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/SigCharts/status/2104624389115564299](https://x.com/SigCharts/status/2104624389115564299)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of TradingView's Terms of Use section 22A detailing a $29.95 monthly Technology Fee per user for invite-only indicators when access exceeds 100 users, aligning with the post's claim of a newly introduced, unannounced charge on publishers.  

> 
> "TradingView just snuck this into their Terms of Use... Not live yet; no announcement. 

Over 100 users on your invite-only script?
$29.95 per user, per month. From you.
This platform is cooked."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@cchajbpxoluwson` (https://x.com/cchajbpxoluwson)