$SOON
Heating UpSnapshot Window: 2026-09-27 03:50 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 534
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed
THORChain faces criticism for handling stolen funds Their response is quite straightforward: the protocol is permissionless, unable to arbitrarily block individual addresses The big question here is: does responsibility lie with the protocol, or with those who use it?
AI visual note: A tweet from @THORChain responding to criticism about handling stolen funds (referenced in a quoted @MistTrack_io post about a $1.46B @Bybit_Official hack and $1.2B in stolen funds), arguing that like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain, THORChain is permissionless and shouldn't bear responsibility for handling known stolen funds. The tweet tags @star_okx and @GracyBitget while posing the rhetorical question of where liability should fall.
nice