# $MOONCATS Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-27 02:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $MOONCATS  
> **Momentum Status:** Low signal  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-27 02:20 UTC (2026-09-27T02:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-27-02-20/crypto/MOONCATS  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-27-02-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 74
- **Likes:** 3
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 2, Likes: 3, Impressions: 74


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @qlonline
> **Author:** [@qlonline](https://x.com/qlonline)  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 2 comments · 1.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/qlonline/status/2104011427128504393](https://x.com/qlonline/status/2104011427128504393)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot from The Coinformer showing a quote from THORChain's January roadmap, which states that "Wallet screening will be added to the interface to try to prevent bad actors from using it," even though THORChain's protocol itself is permissionless and cannot censor transactions. The image relates to the post's criticism of THORChain for allegedly allowing flagged hacker addresses (from the Bitget and Bybit hacks) to launder funds through its platform to swap into BTC, despite having acknowledged the need for wallet screening.  

> 
> "Can you be any more shameless, 
@THORChain
?

This time, the dirty money from the Bitget hack and last time's Bybit hack both went through you to swap into BTC and launder it out. You clearly knew they were flagged hacker addresses, but for the sake of earning a little fee, you"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@GhostcatJoypad` (https://x.com/GhostcatJoypad)