# $ADA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-25 08:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $ADA  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-25 08:20 UTC (2026-09-25T08:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-25-08-20/crypto/ADA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-25-08-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 680
- **Likes:** 66
- **Retweets:** 11
- **Comments:** 6

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 6, Retweets: 11, Likes: 66, Impressions: 680


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @w4nkie
> **Author:** [@w4nkie](https://x.com/w4nkie)  
> **Metrics:** 5 likes · 0 retweets · 2 comments · 211 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/w4nkie/status/2103393100622070245](https://x.com/w4nkie/status/2103393100622070245)  


> **Visual Context:** The image displays two NFT collections with their Bitcoin prices and performance metrics: "BITCOIN WEIRD..." showing 0.0006 BTC (up 192.3%) with a value of 0.06 BTC, and "Quantum Cats" showing 0.0079 BTC (up 21.5%) with a value of 0.05 BTC.

This appears to illustrate the post's point about ROI and liquidity, showing that Bitcoin Ordinals NFTs can show massive percentage gains, but the actual Bitcoin value traded remains extremely small (just 0.05-0.06 BTC total), highlighting how a single sale can dramatically inflate percentage returns while representing negligible volume in the broader market.  

> 
> "Best ROI?

Lets have a look here.

Holding one puppet for the week would have made you $500 if you sold

$500 is the total weekly volume of the entire ftw collection.

Meaning you would have had to buy every single ftw nft, then sold them all while keeping the price stable"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@SLFMR1` (https://x.com/SLFMR1)