# $ULTAPP Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-24 23:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $ULTAPP  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-24 23:30 UTC (2026-09-24T23:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-24-23-30/crypto/ULTAPP  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-24-23-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 1
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 1


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @deltaxbt
> **Author:** [@deltaxbt](https://x.com/deltaxbt)  
> **Metrics:** 39 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 3.9K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/deltaxbt/status/2103217100760252899](https://x.com/deltaxbt/status/2103217100760252899)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a cryptocurrency exchange interface displaying a long list of token pairs (mostly "Bitget - Net wallet") with various ticker names like SUI, COPE, NENG, DIMO, BLT, and others, all showing zero balances and zero USD values across hundreds of empty wallet addresses.

The image appears to show Bitget exchange wallets being systematically emptied, which visually supports the claim in the post that Bitget was potentially hacked for over $100M, as the drained token balances across multiple wallets suggest significant unauthorized fund movements.  

> 
> "BITGET POTENTIALLY HACKED FOR OVER $100M: ONCHAIN"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@DeeRod` (https://x.com/DeeRod)