# $SELOR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-24 21:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $SELOR  
> **Momentum Status:** Sudden Spike  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-24 21:40 UTC (2026-09-24T21:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-24-21-40/crypto/SELOR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-24-21-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 0
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 0


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @ArtofConviction
> **Author:** [@ArtofConviction](https://x.com/ArtofConviction)  
> **Metrics:** 44 likes · 13 retweets · 20 comments · 1.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ArtofConviction/status/2103222618732290148](https://x.com/ArtofConviction/status/2103222618732290148)  


> **Visual Context:** The image displays a digital collection page titled "My zkSNARKs (23)" showcasing 23 pixelated character avatars with varied colors and accessories, all marked as "not listed" with a 0 ZEC estimated value. This appears to support the post's defense of NFTs as legitimate digital art, showing a personal collection of 23 character-based NFTs where no utility was promised—aligning with the author's argument that speculative digital art purchases aren't inherently a "grift" when buyers willingly pay their desired price.  

> 
> "I see lots of dunking on a so called "grift" NFT project.

People willingly bid the price they wanted to pay for Digital Art with an extra side of speculation, I see nothing wrong with that especially when no "utility" was promised in the first place.

I believe NFTs are the"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Seth_100x` (https://x.com/Seth_100x)