# $POPDEX Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-24 12:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $POPDEX  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-24 12:40 UTC (2026-09-24T12:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-24-12-40/crypto/POPDEX  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-24-12-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 121
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 121


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @katexbt
> **Author:** [@katexbt](https://x.com/katexbt)  
> **Metrics:** 229 likes · 12 retweets · 17 comments · 26.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/katexbt/status/2102781327926067513](https://x.com/katexbt/status/2102781327926067513)  


> **Visual Context:** A Twitter/X post by Hack VC is displayed showing statistics about their "Founders Hotline" (243 submissions, 18% diligence rate, 10% scheduled calls) with a reply thread from Alexander Pack, paired with a photo of a bearded man wearing glasses, while a notice indicates @hack_vc has blocked the user—supporting the caption's accusation of Hack VC pre-emptively blocking critics to silence questions about their practices.  

> 
> "Remember this snout well.

Pre-emptively blocking me or anyone else who dared to question your foul play does not absolve you or anyone else of guilt.
@hack_vc
 have blood on their hands and you should never do any business with them.

It also doesn't help 70% of their PF is junk"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@VincentQV1998` (https://x.com/VincentQV1998)