# $JUMP Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-23 11:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $JUMP  
> **Momentum Status:** Sudden Spike  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-23 11:20 UTC (2026-09-23T11:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-23-11-20/crypto/JUMP  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-23-11-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 2
- **Total Impressions:** 255
- **Likes:** 23
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 14

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 14, Retweets: 0, Likes: 23, Impressions: 255


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @QWarm1990
> **Author:** [@QWarm1990](https://x.com/QWarm1990)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 0 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/QWarm1990/status/2102720220154732986](https://x.com/QWarm1990/status/2102720220154732986)  


> 
> "nghe có vẻ thú vị đó, chúc mừng bạn"


### Post #2 by @reddit
> **Author:** [@reddit](https://x.com/reddit)  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 100 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/reddit/status/c952590d2480120391ea51b9c867d1fe4976ec919917f92550afbe74ffc01492](https://x.com/reddit/status/c952590d2480120391ea51b9c867d1fe4976ec919917f92550afbe74ffc01492)  


> 
> "Are maker orders still cheaper if you count the trades that never fill?

One thing bothers me about maker vs taker comparisons: the maker numbers usually only include orders that filled. If ur bid sits there while the market moves up without you, that missed entry doesn’t show up in ur average execution cost. Crossing the spread does. That seems like a pretty generous comparison for the maker approach.
For anyone who’s compared both on the same strategy did the fee savings survive once you included missed entries and orders you eventually had to chase?"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@0xmani` (https://x.com/0xmani)

- `@XNXX_EN` (https://x.com/XNXX_EN)