# $FIL Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-21 21:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $FIL  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-21 21:50 UTC (2026-09-21T21:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-21-21-50/crypto/FIL  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-21-21-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 100
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 3

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 3, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 100


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @notjazii
> **Author:** [@notjazii](https://x.com/notjazii)  
> **Metrics:** 79 likes · 2 retweets · 14 comments · 6.8K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/notjazii/status/2102063589154750724](https://x.com/notjazii/status/2102063589154750724)  


> **Visual Context:** A benchmark comparison table highlights Grok 4.7 (xhigh) against Grok 4.6, GPT-5.6 Sol (max), and Fable 5.1 (max), showing Grok 4.7 scoring 71.0% on DeepSWE v1.1 software engineering and 64.0% on EEBench electrical engineering at the same $2/$6 per million token pricing as Grok 4.6, though still trailing Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Sol on most metrics like CursorBench 4.0 (46.3% vs 51.8%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (38.0% vs 57.9%).  

> 
> "Grok 4.7 is officially live

spacexai just released their new coding and knowledge work model

model is a big step up from grok 4.6, but still not there with fable and sol yet

> 71 on deepswe
> works longer and checks its own work better
> same price as grok 4.6
> 2x faster"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@reddit` (https://x.com/reddit)