# $QFT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-21 17:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $QFT  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-21 17:20 UTC (2026-09-21T17:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-21-17-20/crypto/QFT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-21-17-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 149
- **Likes:** 16
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 12

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 12, Retweets: 0, Likes: 16, Impressions: 149


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @scaling01
> **Author:** [@scaling01](https://x.com/scaling01)  
> **Metrics:** 236 likes · 3 retweets · 9 comments · 6.2K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/scaling01/status/2102067894863409493](https://x.com/scaling01/status/2102067894863409493)  


> **Visual Context:** **Caption:** A benchmark comparison table showing Grok 4.7 (xhigh) at $2 input / $6 output per million tokens outperforming or matching Grok 4.6, GPT-5.6 Sol (max), and Fable 5.1 (max) across software engineering tasks (CursorBench 4.0: 46.3%, DeepSWE v1.1: 71.0%), multi-hour office work (AA Briefcase v1.1: 1,657), terminal work (Terminal-Bench 4.0: 38.0%), legal work (Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark: 19.6%), clinical reasoning (HealthBench Professional: 56.7%), and electrical engineering (EEBench: 64.0%), highlighting Grok 4.7's competitive performance despite significantly lower pricing than competitors ($20–$50 output).

**Relation to post:** The image visually substantiates the claim that Grok 4  

> 
> "Grok 4.7 is still at $6 output, while being an Opus / Sol class model (~2T)"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@marcismus` (https://x.com/marcismus)