# $FUN Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-17 16:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $FUN  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-17 16:50 UTC (2026-09-17T16:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-17-16-50/crypto/FUN  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-17-16-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 1.4K
- **Likes:** 21
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 8

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 0, Likes: 21, Impressions: 1440


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @StarkWareLtd
> **Author:** [@StarkWareLtd](https://x.com/StarkWareLtd)  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 701 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/StarkWareLtd/status/2100627827443855871](https://x.com/StarkWareLtd/status/2100627827443855871)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a quantum computing cost website states "A Quantum Safe Bitcoin transaction now costs an estimated $76," with the pinned record being 677.32$ on a 100x RTX 3090.  

> 
> "Protecting Bitcoin from the quantum threat starts with understanding it.

A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive a private key from an exposed public key. Preparing for that possibility means understanding the resources an attacker would need, while building"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@what3verman` (https://x.com/what3verman)