# $QTTN Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-15 21:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $QTTN  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-15 21:00 UTC (2026-09-15T21:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-15-21-00/crypto/QTTN  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-15-21-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 387
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 387


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Awoken_Lazarus
> **Author:** [@Awoken_Lazarus](https://x.com/Awoken_Lazarus)  
> **Metrics:** 95 likes · 26 retweets · 8 comments · 1.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Awoken_Lazarus/status/2099852544579190926](https://x.com/Awoken_Lazarus/status/2099852544579190926)  


> **Visual Context:** A dashboard displaying mining pool statistics shows Lazarus Pool now derives 51% of its hashrate (2.90 PH/s) from DATUM gateways versus 48% (2.72 PH/s) from public stratum, confirming the post's claim that the pool has crossed majority DATUM adoption. The right chart breaks down DATUM routing across 69 gateways, with DouPool at 45% (1.31 PH/s), BTCB2 at 18%, and the remaining ~37% distributed among smaller operators, illustrating the migration of large hashing farms away from stratum.  

> 
> "Lazarus Pool is now majority DATUM. We have had at least two large hashing farms switch from stratum to DATUM gateways due to the subsidy created from stratum fees, nearly 2 PH/s migrated."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@OttoSuwen` (https://x.com/OttoSuwen)