# $INJ Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-15 07:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $INJ  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-15 07:30 UTC (2026-09-15T07:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-15-07-30/crypto/INJ  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-15-07-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 162
- **Likes:** 15
- **Retweets:** 8
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 8, Likes: 15, Impressions: 162


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @798_eth
> **Author:** [@798_eth](https://x.com/798_eth)  
> **Metrics:** 22 likes · 1 retweets · 4 comments · 3.7K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/798_eth/status/2099726483006828931](https://x.com/798_eth/status/2099726483006828931)  


> **Visual Context:** A Telegram chat screenshot showing a completed USDT transfer of 100,000 from wallet 0xa1bc...f6bb to wallet 7893d, with a third-party wallet hash and completion of 36万 (360,000) at 1AM UTC+0, serving as on-chain evidence to verify the disputed fund handling claims mentioned in the post.  

> 
> "Both intermediaries stated that they did not handle this sum of funds. I'll hold onto that statement for now and hope for more complete, verifiable evidence to emerge later.

On-chain statements are the most accurate.

Based on the chat screenshots and public on-chain records,"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@VoidWalkerc8` (https://x.com/VoidWalkerc8)