# $OTHERSIDE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-13 15:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $OTHERSIDE  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-13 15:20 UTC (2026-09-13T15:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-13-15-20/crypto/OTHERSIDE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-13-15-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 19
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 19


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @RusanX
> **Author:** [@RusanX](https://x.com/RusanX)  
> **Metrics:** 63 likes · 4 retweets · 13 comments · 159 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/RusanX/status/2099148073599422567](https://x.com/RusanX/status/2099148073599422567)  


> **Visual Context:** An infographic from TermiX titled 'Six Revenue Streams, One Dominant One' showing that Protocol Fee accounts for 73.0% ($1.2M) of revenue, with other streams including Prover-as-a-Service ($150K, 9.1%), Agent Subscriptions ($123K, 7.5%), Slash Distribution, TEE Hosting, and Priority Matching.  

> 
> "Everyone quoting TermiX's fee talks about the 2% protocol cut on job volume. That's actually the smaller piece of the model they've laid out.

The whitepaper splits revenue into six streams, and only three are on chain. The 2% protocol fee is non bypassable, enforced at the"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@PugmeWontDie` (https://x.com/PugmeWontDie)