# $BIGCHOG Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-13 08:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $BIGCHOG  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-13 08:10 UTC (2026-09-13T08:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-13-08-10/crypto/BIGCHOG  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-13-08-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 476
- **Likes:** 32
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 21

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 21, Retweets: 0, Likes: 32, Impressions: 476


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @duola_eth
> **Author:** [@duola_eth](https://x.com/duola_eth)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 19 comments · 4.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/duola_eth/status/2098987009130000418](https://x.com/duola_eth/status/2098987009130000418)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a Blur marketplace listing for the "Original Blokyz" NFT collection, displaying four cartoonish skull-masked character items (Blokyz #587, #240, #241, and #239) each listed at 0.0771 ETH, with a floor price down 16.3%—reflecting the poster's lament about overpaying ~800 for two of these NFTs that have since crashed in value.  

> 
> "Back then, I took a swing at 
@OriginalBlokyz
 and missed.

Ended up spending over 800 to buy two.

How did it crash like this now?"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@bigchog` (https://x.com/bigchog)