# $RAUCHG Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-11 02:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $RAUCHG  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-11 02:20 UTC (2026-09-11T02:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-11-02-20/crypto/RAUCHG  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-11-02-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 261
- **Likes:** 2
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 2, Impressions: 261


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @inhuman
> **Author:** [@inhuman](https://x.com/inhuman)  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 3 retweets · 4 comments · 274 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/inhuman/status/2098234068269674502](https://x.com/inhuman/status/2098234068269674502)  


> **Visual Context:** A text post discussing sampled public feeds across 15 sites with rankings showing #1 at 1,715,551 openings, @JupiterExchange Gacha at #2 with 236,579, @Courtyard_io at #3 with 95,096, and @Collector_Crypt at #4 with 14,537, noting that 77% of recorded openings went to Tilt while a highlighted section mentions that only 22.5% of sampled openings returned cards worth at least the pack price, while @shinylabs has 49.9%  

> 
> "22.5% of packs from our competitors paid back to their users.

Meanwhile, Shiny 2x'd that with 49.9%, by far the highest.

And we aren't even top 5 yet?

So much higher."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@rauchg` (https://x.com/rauchg)