# $OBJKT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-09 20:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $OBJKT  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-09 20:50 UTC (2026-09-09T20:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-09-20-50/crypto/OBJKT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-09-20-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 109
- **Likes:** 6
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 0, Likes: 6, Impressions: 109


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @based16z
> **Author:** [@based16z](https://x.com/based16z)  
> **Metrics:** 19 likes · 0 retweets · 5 comments · 1.7K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/based16z/status/2097790245269913813](https://x.com/based16z/status/2097790245269913813)  


> **Visual Context:** The slide is titled "IONQ COMPUTE HARDENED SECURITY" and presents IonQ's roadmap for fault-tolerant quantum computing, highlighting that in September 2026 their system could recover a 256-bit elliptic-curve key in approximately 26 days using ~20,000 physical qubits—a milestone IonQ notes would have broad commercial impact across chemistry, materials, and bio and lifesciences. The post frames this as a warning that IonQ publicly claims its quantum systems could eventually crack the elliptic-curve cryptography securing Bitcoin wallets in under two years, which the post suggests makes IonQ a leading (or "worst," depending on perspective) threat to current crypto security.  

> 
> "To clarify this public company said we can steal your bitcoin in under 2 years. And they’re like the worst quantum company"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@cryptolust_nft` (https://x.com/cryptolust_nft)