# $OP Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-07 05:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $OP  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-07 05:10 UTC (2026-09-07T05:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-07-05-10/crypto/OP  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-07-05-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 303
- **Likes:** 29
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 17

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 17, Retweets: 2, Likes: 29, Impressions: 303


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @cryptoamanclub
> **Author:** [@cryptoamanclub](https://x.com/cryptoamanclub)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 897 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/cryptoamanclub/status/2096829512915071136](https://x.com/cryptoamanclub/status/2096829512915071136)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of on-chain messages from a hacker to Blockstream regarding the Liquid Network exploit, showing small BTC transactions (0.00000546 BTC and 0.00010000 BTC) with a red-underlined message requesting nodes be patched before funds are returned, followed by an encrypted PGP message. The address "bc1ql4mfu6...6gyqjlte" serves as the communication channel between the alleged white-hat hacker and Blockstream following the theft of 4,000 BTC from the Liquid sidechain.  

> 
> "$320M in 
$BTC
 moved from Liquid Network. The hacker is contacting them on-chain.

4,000 
$BTC
 taken through a SideSwap key exploit. Blockstream paused the sidechain.

Hacker: "We are whitehats."

Blockstream: "Talk via email/Signal."

White-hat or heist? Not confirmed yet."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@mahsa_tin` (https://x.com/mahsa_tin)