# $OFFICE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-07 01:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $OFFICE  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-07 01:20 UTC (2026-09-07T01:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-07-01-20/crypto/OFFICE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-07-01-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 247
- **Likes:** 11
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 3

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 3, Retweets: 2, Likes: 11, Impressions: 247


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Marcorubio47Q
> **Author:** [@Marcorubio47Q](https://x.com/Marcorubio47Q)  
> **Metrics:** 12 likes · 4 retweets · 0 comments · 595 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Marcorubio47Q/status/2096694365544440022](https://x.com/Marcorubio47Q/status/2096694365544440022)  


> **Visual Context:** A tweet from David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) explaining that his statement "XRP cannot be cheap" refers to its use for payments, illustrating that whether XRP costs $1 or $1 million, the cost to transfer $1 million remains the same.  

> 
> "David Schwartz made the point VERY CLEAR:

“XRP CAN’T BE DIRT CHEAP.”

His example was simple:

If XRP = $1, moving $1M requires 1 MILLION XRP.

If XRP = $1M, moving that same $1M requires just ONE XRP.

And he clarified it: he was talking about XRP being used for PAYMENTS."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Fayyonchain` (https://x.com/Fayyonchain)