# $DOODLES Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-05 04:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $DOODLES  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-05 04:00 UTC (2026-09-05T04:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-05-04-00/crypto/DOODLES  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-05-04-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 475
- **Likes:** 7
- **Retweets:** 3
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 3, Likes: 7, Impressions: 475


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @gmoneyNFT
> **Author:** [@gmoneyNFT](https://x.com/gmoneyNFT)  
> **Metrics:** 5 likes · 2 retweets · 4 comments · 2.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/gmoneyNFT/status/2096043614807691376](https://x.com/gmoneyNFT/status/2096043614807691376)  


> **Visual Context:** A dark-themed FAQ interface displays expandable question cards, with one highlighted in blue answering "What fees should I expect in Bittensor?"—explaining that the TAO.com app is free but users pay standard Bittensor network fees when sending TAO or staking. Other visible questions include "How secure is my TAO in this wallet?", "What are Bittensor subnets?", and "Who operates TAO.com?" This directly relates to the poster's concern about hidden fees on their Tao.com wallet, providing reassurance that fees are network-based rather than platform fees collected by Tao.com, which supports their search for an alternative wallet.  

> 
> "Okay about to nuke my 
Tao.com wallet on hidden fees.  I need reco for a new Tao wallet please"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@starlordyftw` (https://x.com/starlordyftw)