# $MINA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-03 19:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $MINA  
> **Momentum Status:** Sudden Spike  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-03 19:00 UTC (2026-09-03T19:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-03-19-00/crypto/MINA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-03-19-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 1.1K
- **Likes:** 45
- **Retweets:** 16
- **Comments:** 8

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 16, Likes: 45, Impressions: 1057


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @nonfungibletoes
> **Author:** [@nonfungibletoes](https://x.com/nonfungibletoes)  
> **Metrics:** 24 likes · 5 retweets · 1 comments · 1.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/nonfungibletoes/status/2095525306903777285](https://x.com/nonfungibletoes/status/2095525306903777285)  


> **Visual Context:** A 7-day "Sales & Floor Price" chart showing an NFT collection's floor price in ETH, which remained relatively stable between 0.01 and 0.02 ETH for most of the week before spiking sharply to ~0.03 ETH at the end of the timeline. The sharp price spike illustrates the post's claim that the market hadn't anticipated ("wasn't priced in") the effect of XCOPY's tweet on the collection's value.  

> 
> "XCOPY tweet was not priced in 👀"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@o1_labs` (https://x.com/o1_labs)