# $BAYC Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-02 20:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $BAYC  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-02 20:40 UTC (2026-09-02T20:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-02-20-40/crypto/BAYC  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-02-20-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 127
- **Likes:** 13
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 2, Likes: 13, Impressions: 127


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @frostymetrics
> **Author:** [@frostymetrics](https://x.com/frostymetrics)  
> **Metrics:** 34 likes · 5 retweets · 3 comments · 1.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/frostymetrics/status/2095207196305051659](https://x.com/frostymetrics/status/2095207196305051659)  


> **Visual Context:** A Frosty Metrics bar chart titled "Avalanche Fees Undercut Ethereum's By 97x" displays average transaction fees from August 2026 across eight blockchains, showing Ethereum at $0.1557, TRON at $0.0752, BNB Chain at $0.0345, Polygon at $0.0127, Base at $0.0107, Solana at $0.0077, Arbitrum at $0.0069, and Avalanche at the lowest at $0.0016—visually reinforcing the post's claim that Avalanche's transaction costs are dramatically lower than competing networks.  

> 
> "A transaction on 
@avax
 costs $0.0016.
The same transaction on 
@ethereum
 is 97 times more expensive at $0.1557.

Avalanche also undercuts 
@solana
, 
@base
, 
@0xPolygon
, 
@binance
 chain, and 
@arbitrum
.

Cheap blockspace is not a side effect on Avalanche. It is by design."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@the1_im_here` (https://x.com/the1_im_here)