# $RGB Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-01 08:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $RGB  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-01 08:30 UTC (2026-09-01T08:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-01-08-30/crypto/RGB  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-01-08-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 391
- **Likes:** 10
- **Retweets:** 5
- **Comments:** 2

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 5, Likes: 10, Impressions: 391


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @GoPlusSecurity
> **Author:** [@GoPlusSecurity](https://x.com/GoPlusSecurity)  
> **Metrics:** 17 likes · 5 retweets · 1 comments · 5.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/GoPlusSecurity/status/2094619682217292141](https://x.com/GoPlusSecurity/status/2094619682217292141)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows an Etherscan transaction record confirming a successful USDC transfer of 62,489 ($62,481.13) from the victim (Fake_Phishing187019) to the phisher (Fake_Phishing379138) on August 31, 2026, illustrating the post's point about an unrevoked malicious Permit allowance being exploited again 779 days later to drain another ~$62k from the same victim.  

> 
> "Same trap, new victim. Revoke old / unused allowances on a schedule A user signed a malicious Permit 779 days ago and got drained for ~100k USDC. Never revoked it. Phisher came back and hit them again — another ~$62k USDC gone.

Victim:"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@lxd821006` (https://x.com/lxd821006)