# $INCAWZTRUST Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-31 06:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $INCAWZTRUST  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-31 06:20 UTC (2026-08-31T06:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-31-06-20/crypto/INCAWZTRUST  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-31-06-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 126
- **Likes:** 6
- **Retweets:** 7
- **Comments:** 8

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 7, Likes: 6, Impressions: 126


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @CryptoTaxSucks
> **Author:** [@CryptoTaxSucks](https://x.com/CryptoTaxSucks)  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 531 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/CryptoTaxSucks/status/2094297208598442051](https://x.com/CryptoTaxSucks/status/2094297208598442051)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a tweet by Tascha (@TaschaLabs) dated August 23, 2021, reading: 'If you make a NFT of a real diamond, and the diamond itself gets destroyed in a fire tomorrow, you still have the same asset. Because the token still exists and is in limited supply just as before. Nothing has changed. What NFT is doing to the concept of asset, few understand.'  

> 
> "If you don't know the lore:

>Tascha buys a 1.3 carat diamond for $5k
>Mints NFT 
>Destroys the real diamond w/ autoshop drill
>Sells the NFT for 5.5 ETH
>NFT resells for 11 ETH

All while real diamonds dropped 40% in value.

Are NFTs really THIS back?"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@BurlyDresser` (https://x.com/BurlyDresser)