# $ETH116688 Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-30 13:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $ETH116688  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-30 13:20 UTC (2026-08-30T13:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-30-13-20/crypto/ETH116688  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-30-13-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 8
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 8


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Ministerr
> **Author:** [@Ministerr](https://x.com/Ministerr)  
> **Metrics:** 53 likes · 7 retweets · 36 comments · 2.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Ministerr/status/2094049624344441222](https://x.com/Ministerr/status/2094049624344441222)  


> **Visual Context:** A cryptocurrency revenue leaderboard displays 24-hour earnings for top protocols, with Hyperliquid at rank 6 earning $758,325 across 2 chains and Pons closely behind at rank 7 with $693,125 on 1 chain, followed by fomo ($646,539) and Polymarket ($630,796). The image supports the post by showing that despite Hyperliquid and Pons having nearly identical daily revenues, the two platforms operate on different numbers of chains, hinting at a comparison to Robinhood's single-chain approach.  

> 
> "PONS and Hyperliquid 24hr revenue is almost the same?

Robinhood."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@ETH116688` (https://x.com/ETH116688)