# $GOLD Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-29 12:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $GOLD  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-29 12:30 UTC (2026-08-29T12:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-29-12-30/crypto/GOLD  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-29-12-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 17.6K
- **Likes:** 31
- **Retweets:** 4
- **Comments:** 29

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 29, Retweets: 4, Likes: 31, Impressions: 17615


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Ian_Unsworth
> **Author:** [@Ian_Unsworth](https://x.com/Ian_Unsworth)  
> **Metrics:** 78 likes · 15 retweets · 11 comments · 6.8K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Ian_Unsworth/status/2093344046110355608](https://x.com/Ian_Unsworth/status/2093344046110355608)  


> **Visual Context:** The image, sourced from Kairos Research and dated September 28, 2024, displays a ranked roster of 89 accounts that voted "No" on SGP-0002 (Double Dissolution) on Solana, sorted by stake size. With 61.1% opposition, the chart highlights top validators like Figment (1.106m SOL, 21.35%), Ledger by Figment, Kraken 2, Everstake, and P2P.org, alongside smaller entities like ReFi Hub and anonymous wallets at the bottom—showing the broad coalition of stake opposing the proposal despite it ultimately failing to reach the 33.3% threshold needed to pass.  

> 
> "full list of "No" votes on SGP-0002 

if you delegate to any of these validators you should consider moving stake if you're unaligned 

disappointing to see many large entities don't have the best interest of SOL in mind & many of the same names which killed SIMD-0228 returning"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Cointelegraph` (https://x.com/Cointelegraph)