# $MON Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-28 11:50 UTC > **Asset:** $MON > **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-28 11:50 UTC (2026-08-28T11:50:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-28-11-50/crypto/MON > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-28-11-50/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 2 - **Total Impressions:** 364 - **Likes:** 9 - **Retweets:** 2 - **Comments:** 2 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 2, Likes: 9, Impressions: 364 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @EliBenSasson > **Author:** [@EliBenSasson](https://x.com/EliBenSasson) > **Metrics:** 40 likes · 2 retweets · 6 comments · 3.4K views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/EliBenSasson/status/2093225524747272280](https://x.com/EliBenSasson/status/2093225524747272280) > **Visual Context:** The diagram illustrates a complex CPU architecture showing protected memory components (XuCode, MCHECK, Enclave code) interacting with user-mode code, OS code, microcode, and uncore IPs via x86 ISA, ecalls/ocalls, and various side-band channels. This technical schematic of TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) infrastructure—including MMIOs, MSRs, and CRBUS connections—visually supports the post's claim that TEEs have a sprawling attack surface and trust dependencies, contrasting it with the minimalist integrity guarantees of zkSTARKs. > > "I’ve said this many years ago. TEE are inherently a weak security technology. Go zkSTARK for future proof integrity." ### Post #2 by @Rizvi_On_X > **Author:** [@Rizvi_On_X](https://x.com/Rizvi_On_X) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 0 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Rizvi_On_X/status/2093304379223019681](https://x.com/Rizvi_On_X/status/2093304379223019681) > > "roadmap and token details laid out clearly makes evaluating BDX much easier." --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@mikeinweb` (https://x.com/mikeinweb) - `@Coinvestor777` (https://x.com/Coinvestor777)