# $ARGONAUT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-26 16:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $ARGONAUT  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-26 16:20 UTC (2026-08-26T16:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-26-16-20/crypto/ARGONAUT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-26-16-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 777
- **Likes:** 24
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 8

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 2, Likes: 24, Impressions: 777


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @toly
> **Author:** [@toly](https://x.com/toly)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 6 comments · 5.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/toly/status/2092649262853320984](https://x.com/toly/status/2092649262853320984)  


> 
> "Sgp-3 burn based on requested CUs is basically the same thing as we had a year ago, with 50% of the priority fees burned.  Priority is priced per requested CU.  If there were no side channel attacks, and 12 different teams weren’t building alternative tpu ports, it’s a super easy"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@le699a` (https://x.com/le699a)