# $META Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-26 01:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $META  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-26 01:20 UTC (2026-08-26T01:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-26-01-20/crypto/META  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-26-01-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 513
- **Likes:** 7
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 2

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 0, Likes: 7, Impressions: 513


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @catmoneyz
> **Author:** [@catmoneyz](https://x.com/catmoneyz)  
> **Metrics:** 4 likes · 0 retweets · 2 comments · 1.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/catmoneyz/status/2092360339732242617](https://x.com/catmoneyz/status/2092360339732242617)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of the X (Twitter) profile for "anon" (@anonchain) showing a blocked status and a recent post about "toxic traders" in the NFT market, which directly relates to the accompanying caption's commentary about the user's complaints shifting blame for poor project performance, particularly regarding $uPEG and uToken mentioned in the pinned tweet.  

> 
> "So i posted some truth and suddenly fp responsibility is on me because i posted it just awhile ago, suddenly its my fault the project isnt doing well?? Lolol

How about you? So you’ve been hardshilling $upeg and utoken, what did it do? Because of toxic shit like you upeg isnt"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@sacha` (https://x.com/sacha)