# $BONK Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-25 22:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $BONK  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-25 22:20 UTC (2026-08-25T22:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-22-20/crypto/BONK  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-22-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 9
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 9


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @lisabeyy
> **Author:** [@lisabeyy](https://x.com/lisabeyy)  
> **Metrics:** 15 likes · 2 retweets · 2 comments · 513 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/lisabeyy/status/2092215833586020629](https://x.com/lisabeyy/status/2092215833586020629)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a $100 USDC prize pool in escrow from a verified giveaway, where 50 winners (each receiving $2) were selected via random draw with on-chain proof, as evidenced by the 233 entries and usernames like @f.uluaad, @Moses.l_01, and @OWeb3 listed as winners. This directly supports the post's claim by demonstrating that 50 participants were paid automatically without needing to share wallet addresses, thanks to the escrow mechanism.  

> 
> "50 people got paid from this verified giveaway, and not a single wallet address was shared in the process 
@looftapay
  >>>"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@0xRexnftcrypto` (https://x.com/0xRexnftcrypto)