# $ALCA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-25 20:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $ALCA  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-25 20:20 UTC (2026-08-25T20:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-20-20/crypto/ALCA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-20-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 189
- **Likes:** 30
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 31

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 31, Retweets: 0, Likes: 30, Impressions: 189


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @maxekaplan
> **Author:** [@maxekaplan](https://x.com/maxekaplan)  
> **Metrics:** 29 likes · 4 retweets · 6 comments · 1.9K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/maxekaplan/status/2092299537733853314](https://x.com/maxekaplan/status/2092299537733853314)  


> **Visual Context:** The image is a title slide from Everstake featuring the Solana logo, titled "Everstake's View: Solana Double Disinflation Proposal (SGP-0002)," which directly relates to the post discussing opposition to this very proposal in favor of redirecting staker priority fees and reducing inflation to 1-2%.  

> 
> "Do not agree here.

The ideal state for staking economics IMO is stakers get prio fees (ie: SIMD-123) and validators get some nominal amount of inflation (ie: 1-2% gross). 

While Solana is a platform that produces a lot of revenue, the revenue today does not flow back to token"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@GeorgeVogx` (https://x.com/GeorgeVogx)