# $MANA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-25 18:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $MANA  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-25 18:10 UTC (2026-08-25T18:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-18-10/crypto/MANA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-18-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 338
- **Likes:** 10
- **Retweets:** 4
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 4, Likes: 10, Impressions: 338


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Ms_Elizzaah
> **Author:** [@Ms_Elizzaah](https://x.com/Ms_Elizzaah)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 4 retweets · 8 comments · 4.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Ms_Elizzaah/status/2092306584030630264](https://x.com/Ms_Elizzaah/status/2092306584030630264)  


> **Visual Context:** The image is an infographic titled "HOW SAFE IS COINEX TODAY?" highlighting the September 2023 security incident where abnormal hot wallet withdrawals were detected and user losses were fully covered, alongside improvements like stronger hot/cold wallet infrastructure, multi-signature controls, offline private keys, and a 10% CoinEx Shield Fund. It directly supports the post's point by emphasizing the strengthened security measures taken after the past incident, including hardware authentication, real-time monitoring, and Proof of Reserves verification showing reserve ratios exceeding 100% for assets like BTC, ETH, USDT, and USDC.  

> 
> "A past security incident shouldn’t be ignored, but it also shouldn’t be the only thing used to judge an exchange.

For me, the real question is what changed afterward.
@coinexcom
 has since strengthened wallet architecture, multi-signature controls, offline key protection,"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@CanessaDCL` (https://x.com/CanessaDCL)