# $POLY Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-25 14:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $POLY  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-25 14:40 UTC (2026-08-25T14:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-14-40/crypto/POLY  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-14-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 948
- **Likes:** 12
- **Retweets:** 6
- **Comments:** 6

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 6, Retweets: 6, Likes: 12, Impressions: 948


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @GregTonoski
> **Author:** [@GregTonoski](https://x.com/GregTonoski)  
> **Metrics:** 82 likes · 11 retweets · 12 comments · 1.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/GregTonoski/status/2092181727636513041](https://x.com/GregTonoski/status/2092181727636513041)  


> **Visual Context:** A Bitcoin block visualization shows an expected block on the left filled with varied transaction sizes, while the actual block on the right (Transaction b47eba14...fec659c7, mined by MARA Pool) contains a single 6,095,165 sat/vB RBF-enabled OP_RETURN transaction with a 998.39 vB virtual size, earning a $4,858.70 fee—a contrast illustrating the 1MB OP_RETURN spam attack broadcast by MARA on May 14, 2025.  

> 
> "Did you know? Bitcoin was attacked with 1MB spam filling the whole block size limit, using OP_RETURN flaw in a single transaction. That spam was broadcast by MARA on 14 may 2025. The attacker bypassed the network filters and collaborated directly with MARA to inflict the damage."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Alchemy` (https://x.com/Alchemy)