# $PEPE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-25 05:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $PEPE  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-25 05:40 UTC (2026-08-25T05:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-05-40/crypto/PEPE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-25-05-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 27
- **Likes:** 3
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 3, Impressions: 27


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @BlockBloomer
> **Author:** [@BlockBloomer](https://x.com/BlockBloomer)  
> **Metrics:** 25 likes · 0 retweets · 7 comments · 7.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/BlockBloomer/status/2091802417667199152](https://x.com/BlockBloomer/status/2091802417667199152)  


> **Visual Context:** A Chinese-language chat screenshot showing a conversation between users "y gu," "zidong you," and "dong lan," where they discuss pool fees and jokingly debate whether "a pool swap" sounds like "a pool boyfriend swap," before y gu reveals a $5W capital cost. The banter humorously personifies pool trading mechanics, contrasting with the post's technical observation that BNB Chain v4 Hooks strategies for low-fee outer quoting and high-fee inner execution have lost effectiveness in WBNB/USDC and WBNB/USDT pools after extended two-hour scanning windows.  

> 
> "The net has been cast, "On BNB Chain, the trick of using v4 Hooks for 'low-fee quotes on the outer layer, high-fee executions on the inner layer' has basically become ineffective recently."

At least in the WBNB/USDC and WBNB/USDT pools, I scanned two full two-hour windows in a"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Wizardofthesky` (https://x.com/Wizardofthesky)