# $NEO Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-24 18:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $NEO  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-24 18:00 UTC (2026-08-24T18:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-24-18-00/crypto/NEO  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-24-18-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 35
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 35


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @CryptosR_Us
> **Author:** [@CryptosR_Us](https://x.com/CryptosR_Us)  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 1.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/CryptosR_Us/status/2091949661267313151](https://x.com/CryptosR_Us/status/2091949661267313151)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows the opening page of a legal complaint filed by the Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Illinois's Digital Asset Tax Act (35 ILCS 195/3-5), with highlighted text emphasizing the Act's unprecedented taxation on digital-asset activities where customers may "gain nothing." This visually supports the post's report about crypto groups suing Illinois over the 0.2% digital asset tax they argue unlawfully singles out cryptocurrency transactions.  

> 
> "JUST IN:  Crypto groups are taking Illinois to court over its new 0.2% digital asset tax.

The 
@BlockchainAssn
 and 
@crypto_council
 argue the tax unlawfully singles out crypto while comparable traditional financial activity goes untaxed.

The groups are seeking to block the tax"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Ledensy` (https://x.com/Ledensy)