# $BRRRBON Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-24 16:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $BRRRBON  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-24 16:40 UTC (2026-08-24T16:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-24-16-40/crypto/BRRRBON  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-24-16-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 965
- **Likes:** 14
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 4

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 4, Retweets: 1, Likes: 14, Impressions: 965


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @pitown89
> **Author:** [@pitown89](https://x.com/pitown89)  
> **Metrics:** 69 likes · 8 retweets · 2 comments · 2.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/pitown89/status/2091901959049777336](https://x.com/pitown89/status/2091901959049777336)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a Cryptoleakvn tweet announcing that Pi Smart Contracts have passed a third-party audit, featuring an image of the Pi Network GitHub repository with Nicolas Kokkalis listed as founder—though the original post corrects this claim, stating no such audit confirmation was actually found on the official GitHub repo.  

> 
> "CORRECTION NOTICE 

Today I came across a post that's been copy-pasted around purely to farm likes and shares. It claims that the "smart contract has been audited."

But when I checked directly on the official repo:
github.com/PiNetwork/Smar
…

Here's what I actually found:

The"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@elliotlfg` (https://x.com/elliotlfg)