# $0XWEB3WIZARD Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-24 09:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $0XWEB3WIZARD  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-24 09:00 UTC (2026-08-24T09:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-24-09-00/crypto/0XWEB3WIZARD  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-24-09-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 495
- **Likes:** 21
- **Retweets:** 7
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 7, Likes: 21, Impressions: 495


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @waleswoosh
> **Author:** [@waleswoosh](https://x.com/waleswoosh)  
> **Metrics:** 146 likes · 8 retweets · 103 comments · 5.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/waleswoosh/status/2091812048359612625](https://x.com/waleswoosh/status/2091812048359612625)  


> **Visual Context:** A promotional graphic titled "How real teams put Ethos credibility scores to work" displays three case studies: "Filtering a token sale" for MegaETH ($1.39b sale), "Fundraise Diligence" for Legion, and "Human Verification" for Ethos. The image highlights MegaETH as a success story for Ethos scoring, which contradicts the post's criticism that a strong Ethos score didn't prevent the project from declining 70%.  

> 
> "A good Ethos score gave you the opportunity to invest in MegaETH, which is down 70% and now it will allow you to invest in this new thing, which will also be down 70% in a couple weeks"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@0xweb3wizard` (https://x.com/0xweb3wizard)