# $PI Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-22 14:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $PI  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-22 14:00 UTC (2026-08-22T14:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-22-14-00/crypto/PI  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-22-14-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 5
- **Total Impressions:** 7.8K
- **Likes:** 188
- **Retweets:** 23
- **Comments:** 8

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 8, Retweets: 23, Likes: 188, Impressions: 7800


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @HEROonchain
> **Author:** [@HEROonchain](https://x.com/HEROonchain)  
> **Metrics:** 114 likes · 11 retweets · 6 comments · 3.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/HEROonchain/status/2091072894247809291](https://x.com/HEROonchain/status/2091072894247809291)  


> **Visual Context:** The ICP Liquidation Heatmap from Coinglass displays a 3-month price action with overlaid liquidation zones, showing $ICP's recent sharp decline toward $2 and the resulting $1.56M in leveraged long positions being wiped out across the $2.50-$2 liquidity band. The colorful horizontal bands visualize the density of liquidation levels, with the bright yellow-green cluster around $2.10-$2.50 corresponding to the institutional liquidity grab mentioned in the caption.  

> 
> "Massive institutional liquidity grab
$ICP
 wicked down to ~$2, triggering a cascade of liquidations. Institutions swept the liquidity between $2.50 and $2 — those leveraged positions totaled $1.56M.

That’s just the collateral. With perps, the actual positions wiped out were"


### Post #2 by @HOONIGALL
> **Author:** [@HOONIGALL](https://x.com/HOONIGALL)  
> **Metrics:** 60 likes · 11 retweets · 17 comments · 1.7K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/HOONIGALL/status/2091111112829784450](https://x.com/HOONIGALL/status/2091111112829784450)  


> 
> "HIGHER MUCH HIGHER

SOLANA"


### Post #3 by @JR_0x1
> **Author:** [@JR_0x1](https://x.com/JR_0x1)  
> **Metrics:** 28 likes · 1 retweets · 10 comments · 782 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/JR_0x1/status/2091129331921609114](https://x.com/JR_0x1/status/2091129331921609114)  


> **Visual Context:** A dark-mode chat interface displaying a message that reads 'No GTD? I'll pass on this Thanks' as a reply to an unread message above.  

> 
> "This is what NOT over allocating your mint looks like in the DMs with CMs

I totally understand FCFS is not nearly as enticing as a GTD spot for your community but dam lol 

It’s also a risk that the project (me) takes on as well because I’m essentially turning away (at this"


### Post #4 by @Cryptoinsightuk
> **Author:** [@Cryptoinsightuk](https://x.com/Cryptoinsightuk)  
> **Metrics:** 70 likes · 3 retweets · 20 comments · 7.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Cryptoinsightuk/status/2090800575571010035](https://x.com/Cryptoinsightuk/status/2090800575571010035)  


> 
> "When do the 4 year cycle theorists buy?"


### Post #5 by @Yoshi_3000
> **Author:** [@Yoshi_3000](https://x.com/Yoshi_3000)  
> **Metrics:** 12 likes · 2 retweets · 11 comments · 167 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Yoshi_3000/status/2091143792556650940](https://x.com/Yoshi_3000/status/2091143792556650940)  


> 
> "GM and Happy Saturday  

It’s a great weekend and I’m excited to have won a WL to the upcoming Macarune mint by 
@wagyubrands"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Piprotecter` (https://x.com/Piprotecter)

- `@carisma795` (https://x.com/carisma795)

- `@RaphaelNta23933` (https://x.com/RaphaelNta23933)

- `@aikiu_metaverse` (https://x.com/aikiu_metaverse)

- `@Openex_network5` (https://x.com/Openex_network5)