# $YEET Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-22 12:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $YEET  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-22 12:10 UTC (2026-08-22T12:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-22-12-10/crypto/YEET  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-22-12-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 43
- **Likes:** 5
- **Retweets:** 3
- **Comments:** 3

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 3, Retweets: 3, Likes: 5, Impressions: 43


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @crypto_birb
> **Author:** [@crypto_birb](https://x.com/crypto_birb)  
> **Metrics:** 13 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 5.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/crypto_birb/status/2091133297204003086](https://x.com/crypto_birb/status/2091133297204003086)  


> **Visual Context:** A TradingView chart shows the price falling below a descending 200-period moving average, with a Twitter screenshot in the upper right showing a deleted post calling for a long at $68, alongside text noting "POSTED & DELETED HERE" at that level. The image illustrates the poster's apology for previously calling out another trader, using their own failed $68 long call (posted and then deleted) as an example of bias and accountability.  

> 
> "A while ago, I called out 
@CryptoWizardd
. That was a mistake and I apologise for it.

Let me explain everything transparently. Starts simple.

I wrote a post, blurred his name out to make an example of how biases work. Ironically, it exposed my biases.

Soon after I removed the"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Chef_Gee1` (https://x.com/Chef_Gee1)