# $QUIP Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-21 18:00 UTC > **Asset:** $QUIP > **Momentum Status:** Stable > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-21 18:00 UTC (2026-08-21T18:00:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-18-00/crypto/QUIP > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-18-00/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 3 - **Total Impressions:** 692 - **Likes:** 101 - **Retweets:** 4 - **Comments:** 106 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 106, Retweets: 4, Likes: 101, Impressions: 692 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @cryptoklotz > **Author:** [@cryptoklotz](https://x.com/cryptoklotz) > **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 2 comments · 63 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/cryptoklotz/status/2090862385519112500](https://x.com/cryptoklotz/status/2090862385519112500) > > "any chance, if you find something, before you post about it, you can just straight up text me" ### Post #2 by @pudgypenguins > **Author:** [@pudgypenguins](https://x.com/pudgypenguins) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 270 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/pudgypenguins/status/2090862316325671282](https://x.com/pudgypenguins/status/2090862316325671282) > > "@grok How did the US revalue gold and void gold clauses in 1934 to cut its real debt burden ~41%, something Bitcoin’s fixed supply makes impossible?" ### Post #3 by @jon_charb > **Author:** [@jon_charb](https://x.com/jon_charb) > **Metrics:** 36 likes · 4 retweets · 8 comments · 5.5K views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/jon_charb/status/2090837330126934375](https://x.com/jon_charb/status/2090837330126934375) > **Visual Context:** A stacked bar chart titled "Pump.fun: Total Revenue by Product" shows monthly revenue (in USD) from January 2024 through mid-2025 across three products: Pump.fun (green), PumpSwap (purple), and Terminal (yellow). Pump.fun revenue peaks dramatically around January 2025 at ~$140M, then declines sharply, with PumpSwap and Terminal contributing progressively larger shares as the post argues that PUMP offers stronger revenue fundamentals than SOL at a more accessible valuation. > > "agree with pretty much all of these points the challenge now is its just harder to buy SOL at $60bn when HYPE & PUMP are both cheaper, have stronger revenue/fundamentals, & are cleaner expressions together covering most of the SOL thesis but at the layer capturing more value" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@jitusorkar12` (https://x.com/jitusorkar12) - `@ZenFlowEen` (https://x.com/ZenFlowEen) - `@REHANH0SSAIN` (https://x.com/REHANH0SSAIN)