# $OMI Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-21 18:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $OMI  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-21 18:00 UTC (2026-08-21T18:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-18-00/crypto/OMI  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-18-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 2
- **Total Impressions:** 631
- **Likes:** 38
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 5

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 5, Retweets: 1, Likes: 38, Impressions: 631


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @_abgweb3_
> **Author:** [@_abgweb3_](https://x.com/_abgweb3_)  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 93 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/_abgweb3_/status/2090860950303789081](https://x.com/_abgweb3_/status/2090860950303789081)  


> **Visual Context:** An editorial graphic titled 'IS THE CLARITY ACT REALLY GOOD FOR CRYPTO? A REGULATORY FRAMEWORK BUILT AROUND INTERMEDIARIES, NOT TECHNOLOGY,' contrasting decentralized protocols with crypto intermediaries like exchanges, brokers, and custodians.  

> 
> "Is the CLARITY Act really good for crypto?

As Congress pushes action on the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act to mid September, there may be no better time to question whether the bill is actually good for crypto.

In Washington, “CLARITY Act” and “crypto bill” have almost become"


### Post #2 by @rifatNFTs
> **Author:** [@rifatNFTs](https://x.com/rifatNFTs)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 3 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/rifatNFTs/status/2090862000691982354](https://x.com/rifatNFTs/status/2090862000691982354)  


> 
> "hey 
@commonsmade
 vouch 
@oxtochi"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@ToTheMoonBRB` (https://x.com/ToTheMoonBRB)

- `@VeVeFamBam` (https://x.com/VeVeFamBam)