# $HTR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-21 16:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $HTR  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-21 16:10 UTC (2026-08-21T16:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-16-10/crypto/HTR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-16-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 126
- **Likes:** 257
- **Retweets:** 4
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 4, Likes: 257, Impressions: 126


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @reddit
> **Author:** [@reddit](https://x.com/reddit)  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 100 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/reddit/status/00ff1f2a2c1d7e142bb661c1d368165a9d2cc2a65e0b82f08dc4253641f19908](https://x.com/reddit/status/00ff1f2a2c1d7e142bb661c1d368165a9d2cc2a65e0b82f08dc4253641f19908)  


> 
> "GLQ circulating supply discrepancy..which figure should be used for market cap?

I'm looking into GraphLinq (GLQ) and I'm finding conflicting supply figures across different data sources. Some sources still reference the original 500M GLQ ERC-20 supply, while other aggregators/exchanges appear to show higher total-supply figures following the launch of the native GraphLinq chain. What I'm mainly trying to understand from a market valuation perspective is: What is the actual circulating supply of GLQ today? What is the correct total/max supply after accounting for the native chain? Are native-chain block rewards creating additional GLQ beyond the original 500M?"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Kara4lifeHunter` (https://x.com/Kara4lifeHunter)