# $CYPH Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-21 15:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $CYPH  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-21 15:20 UTC (2026-08-21T15:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-15-20/crypto/CYPH  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-21-15-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 10.9K
- **Likes:** 160
- **Retweets:** 17
- **Comments:** 14

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 14, Retweets: 17, Likes: 160, Impressions: 10889


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @DavisLambo
> **Author:** [@DavisLambo](https://x.com/DavisLambo)  
> **Metrics:** 4 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 25 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/DavisLambo/status/2090817101267095802](https://x.com/DavisLambo/status/2090817101267095802)  


> **Visual Context:** A Blockworks Research chart titled 'Uniswap Fee Switch: TVL and Execution Quality' showing v4 Total Value Locked by Chain (Ethereum, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Base, Unichain, Monad, Other) and Price Impact by Trade Size for stablecoin and native-stablecoin pairs.  

> 
> "uniswap fee switch seems to be working better than many expected.

It’s been almost a month since fees went live on V4, and liquidity has stayed mostly stable, even on base where aerodrome is a strong competitor.

people expected LPs to leave, liquidity to drop, and traders to"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@connorking` (https://x.com/connorking)