# $DATS Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-20 14:30 UTC > **Asset:** $DATS > **Momentum Status:** Heating Up > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-20 14:30 UTC (2026-08-20T14:30:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-20-14-30/crypto/DATS > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-20-14-30/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 1 - **Total Impressions:** 75 - **Likes:** 1 - **Retweets:** 0 - **Comments:** 3 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 3, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 75 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @StockSavvyShay > **Author:** [@StockSavvyShay](https://x.com/StockSavvyShay) > **Metrics:** 212 likes · 32 retweets · 35 comments · 31.4K views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/StockSavvyShay/status/2090429438316126698](https://x.com/StockSavvyShay/status/2090429438316126698) > **Visual Context:** This bar chart titled "Annualized Revenue per Active MW ($M)" illustrates the significant revenue disparity across different power utilization models, showing SpaceX generating $50M (High) and $30M (Low) per MW, Neoclouds like CRWV ($9.8M), NBIS ($9.4M), and IREN ($10.4M) leading in AI compute, Colocation providers like DLR ($3.5M), EQIX ($4.4M), and Coresite ($3.6M), and Emerging AI Infrastructure companies—CIFR, WULF, CORZ, and RIOT—all clustered at just $1.3-1.8M per MW. The chart visually supports the post's thesis that Bitcoin mining yields far less revenue per megawatt than colocation or full-stack AI compute, explaining why crypto mining firms are racing to pivot their power capacity toward higher-value AI infrastructure applications. > > "This chart is why secured power is becoming one of the most valuable assets in AI. A MW produces ~$1.5M in bitcoin mining, ~$4M in colocation and ~$10M in full-stack AI compute which explains why you're seeing $CIFR , $WULF , $CORZ and $RIOT all racing to convert capacity as fast" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@gigiz_eth` (https://x.com/gigiz_eth)