# $BLAST Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-20 11:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $BLAST  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-20 11:20 UTC (2026-08-20T11:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-20-11-20/crypto/BLAST  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-20-11-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 96
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 96


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @StarPlatinum_
> **Author:** [@StarPlatinum_](https://x.com/StarPlatinum_)  
> **Metrics:** 14 likes · 1 retweets · 7 comments · 2.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/StarPlatinum_/status/2090394887665414496](https://x.com/StarPlatinum_/status/2090394887665414496)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a 4-hour candlestick chart for the token $CYBERLEEK on SOL, trading at 0.001055 (up 44.50%) with a peak around 0.003499, illustrating the failed pump referenced in the post's criticism that the token couldn't sustain a market cap above $1M despite gaming leak hype.  

> 
> "Imagine having all the leaks of the most expected game oat 

And you decide to launch a token just for not even being able to push it above $1M Mcap

Either the account is fake or this $CYBERLEEK  is just a straight scam"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@catradarusman` (https://x.com/catradarusman)