# $FLR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-20 08:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $FLR  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-20 08:20 UTC (2026-08-20T08:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-20-08-20/crypto/FLR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-20-08-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 105
- **Likes:** 6
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 6, Impressions: 105


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @crypdon_mf
> **Author:** [@crypdon_mf](https://x.com/crypdon_mf)  
> **Metrics:** 18 likes · 0 retweets · 19 comments · 79 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/crypdon_mf/status/2090311365843919058](https://x.com/crypdon_mf/status/2090311365843919058)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a cryptocurrency trading platform displaying data for "$GLORP" with a price of 0.038 (-99.98%) and a market cap of 8,841,738 (10.93%), alongside a collection of colorful NFT artwork featuring cartoon characters with price tags around 0.97 SOL. This visualization supports the post's warning by highlighting multiple red flags: the token's near-total price collapse (shown by the steep red candlestick chart), the copied artwork from an existing Solana project (evidenced by the cartoon characters in the collection buy section), and the suspicious "Market with 0 GET" listing—all indicating a potentially fraudulent NFT mint worth avoiding.  

> 
> "I’d stay far away from the 
@glorpRBH
 mint.

There are already way too many red flags here for me to risk my money.

First, the artwork appears to be taken from an existing Solana project. That alone raises serious questions about the team and the project.

But it gets even more"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@BrukerikkenavnJ` (https://x.com/BrukerikkenavnJ)