# $PLUME Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-18 17:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $PLUME  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-18 17:50 UTC (2026-08-18T17:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-17-50/crypto/PLUME  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-17-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 3.5K
- **Likes:** 8
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 8, Impressions: 3464


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @LorenHodl
> **Author:** [@LorenHodl](https://x.com/LorenHodl)  
> **Metrics:** 40 likes · 3 retweets · 6 comments · 1.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/LorenHodl/status/2089736237322265014](https://x.com/LorenHodl/status/2089736237322265014)  


> 
> "The BIP110 crowd seems to be forgetting one rather important detail: the nodes did vote.

BIP110 had its signaling window, and miner support never came close to the required 55%. In fact, signaling peaked at only about 2.5% in the final voluntary period and averaged under 3%."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@plumenetwork` (https://x.com/plumenetwork)