# $CSPR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-18 09:50 UTC > **Asset:** $CSPR > **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down > **Timestamp:** 2026-08-18 09:50 UTC (2026-08-18T09:50:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-09-50/crypto/CSPR > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-09-50/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 4 - **Total Impressions:** 165 - **Likes:** 5 - **Retweets:** 0 - **Comments:** 0 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 5, Impressions: 165 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @jackbearsupply > **Author:** [@jackbearsupply](https://x.com/jackbearsupply) > **Metrics:** 33 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 431 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/jackbearsupply/status/2089568006221578240](https://x.com/jackbearsupply/status/2089568006221578240) > > "unfollowing all accounts disrespecting dominic or dfinity or any other positive $ICP community members" ### Post #2 by @veilnyx_hq > **Author:** [@veilnyx_hq](https://x.com/veilnyx_hq) > **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 125 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/veilnyx_hq/status/2089635589242982611](https://x.com/veilnyx_hq/status/2089635589242982611) > **Visual Context:** [caption-failed: minimax unavailable] > > "Ethereum exploring native privacy primitives in Hegotá (Frame Transactions + related EIPs) is a big step. Protocol-level improvements + modular multi-chain privacy layers that already work today (with selective de-anonymization) is the practical path for usable, compliant" ### Post #3 by @mariatornero60 > **Author:** [@mariatornero60](https://x.com/mariatornero60) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 3 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mariatornero60/status/2089651076370706632](https://x.com/mariatornero60/status/2089651076370706632) > **Visual Context:** [caption-failed: image unfetchable or no caption] > > "¿Eres de los que les cuesta dar like y apoyar? #hive #costillas" ### Post #4 by @tienho_nyx > **Author:** [@tienho_nyx](https://x.com/tienho_nyx) > **Metrics:** 18 likes · 0 retweets · 22 comments · 175 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/tienho_nyx/status/2089601518567895530](https://x.com/tienho_nyx/status/2089601518567895530) > **Visual Context:** The image is a promotional graphic featuring a glowing green and blue design with two network-connected cubes linked by a bridge structure, topped by a shield-and-padlock icon and the text "Bridge Security – Penetration Tested," along with a stylized "bd" logo at the top. It visually reinforces the post's message about Beldex's rebuilt bridge successfully passing penetration testing, emphasizing the operational security and resilience of its interoperability infrastructure. > > "I normally judge privacy projects by cryptography but the latest Beldex bridge penetration testing made me look harder at operational security around interoperability and resilience On August 14 Beldex said the rebuilt bridge completed penetration testing adding another" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@Casper_Network` (https://x.com/Casper_Network)