# $TREE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-18 04:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $TREE  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-18 04:00 UTC (2026-08-18T04:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-04-00/crypto/TREE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-18-04-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 280
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 1, Impressions: 280


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Murphychen888
> **Author:** [@Murphychen888](https://x.com/Murphychen888)  
> **Metrics:** 77 likes · 5 retweets · 43 comments · 21.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Murphychen888/status/2089298696122909134](https://x.com/Murphychen888/status/2089298696122909134)  


> **Visual Context:** A Glassnode chart titled "按钱包大小分的成本基础" (Cost Basis by Wallet Size) tracks Ethereum's price against cost basis levels for different wallet cohorts (100, 1k, and 10k ETH) from late 2016 to August 2026, showing that as ETH trades at $1,681, the smallest 100-ETH cohort holds a cost basis of $1,928 while larger 10k-ETH whales sit lower at $2,108—supporting the post's argument that the ~$1,500 low represents a genuine, data-backed bottom for Ethereum.  

> 
> "If You Want to Write, Write It Fully (Summary Edition)

At the end of the first tweet, I said: ETH shows a clear bottom at the $1,500 low. This isn't just idle talk, but a judgment based on comprehensive data.

Let's sort through the three tweets, namely:

1. Whether investors"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Lssm888` (https://x.com/Lssm888)